How wrong was Einstein? And why is he still so universally acclaimed?

We are all accustomed to revering Albert Einstein as the genius who came up with the ‘General Theory of Relativity’, and the famous equation e = mc2. His claims are almost universally considered scientific fact. Until recently I have not been aware of any dissenting voices. Not because there aren’t any, but because they have been drowned out in a chorus of praise and adulation. It is also worth noting that almost nobody can understand or explain his theories in an intelligible and meaningful way.

In 1931 a book was published by Dr. Hans Israel, Dr. Erich Ruckhaber, Dr. Rudolf Weinmann, with contributions from Prof. Dr. Del-Negro, Prof. Dr. Driesch, Prof. Dr. De Hartog, Prof. Dr. Kraus, Prof. Dr. Leroux, Prof. Dr. Linke, Prof. Dr. Lothigius, Prof. Dr. Mellin, Dr. Petraschek, Dr. Rauschenberger, Dr.Reuterdahl, Dr. Vogtherr and many more. The book was called “A hundred authors against Einstein“. It summarised many of the objections to Einstein’s claims and pointed out the many logical errors in his work. It details how much of the criticism of Einsteins ideas was simply ignored amidst a media frenzy of support and adulation. The fact that books like this are not known of, is testament to the control and censorship in the mainstream media machine for at least the last 100 years. Do not constrain yourself to thinking it is only a recent phenomenon.

Criticisms of Einsteins work are still raised today by modern critics, see 95 Years of Criticism of the Special Theory of Relativity (1908–2003). The logical fallacy at the heart of Quantum Physics appears to be the belief that reality exists in mathematics as opposed to the fact that mathematics exists in reality. The mistaken belief seems to be that mathematics and geometry govern reality, but in fact they simply describe various aspects of reality and observed patterns within reality.

The video below makes a great point. Theoretical Physicist Michio Kaku makes it clear. It is unfortunate that Flat Earthers like the one who made this video, use one truth (that theoretical physics is pseudoscience) to argue for a complete load of nonsense such as the proposed flat earth idea. The earth is not flat.

The reason that these theoretical physicists have got it so wrong is that they deny reality is an objective absolute. They deny that things are what they are irrespective of any consciousness — which is the way reality is — and they hold that consciousness creates reality. Some of them say so explicitly; all of them say it implicitly. It is essential to understand here that when you reject the idea that reality is an objective absolute, when you reject that contradictions cannot exist, when you reject that everything that exists has identity, you are arguing against the base of all knowledge — the self evident. If one denies the self-evident there can be no base from which to infer any subsequent ‘knowledge’. To consider reality an illusion is a logical error in thinking that has the effect of disconnecting that thinker from reality.

The thinking of modern theoretical physicists is disconnected from reality by these philosophical beliefs. They have arrived at the inevitable intellectual dead end. Their denial of the ground on which they necessarily stand isn’t intellectual competence, it’s intellectual self-destruction, or rather intellectual suicide by ignorance — ignorance of the hierarchical structure of knowledge. I almost feel a twinge of embarrassment for the human race, when I see our leading (supposed) scientists and intellectuals arguing against the the very base of the concept of knowledge. When you understand what they are doing, it looks very silly.

The bigger point here is this: theoretical physics is not the only branch of study that denies objective reality, most so-called ‘sciences’ are in the same position. Legitimate science is dead in the mainstream. How can it be expected to survive the post truth era?

Method

If you want to know the truth here’s what you must do: gather any and all contradictory arguments and weigh them against each other to see which is logically valid. Two or more contradictory claims cannot all be true. It is a fact that counter arguments to Einstein were ignored. This is a very poor indictment of those who did/do the ignoring. It implies they are avoiding rational debate — which detracts enormously from their credibility.

While there exist dissenting voices, these must be listened to, firstly to judge if the objections are valid. Genuine science only moves forward by addressing questions, not by avoiding them. The questions raised, point to where those interested in truth must investigate — in accordance with proper scientific method.

All competing ideas must be tested against reality, and all contradictions thus resolved. The ideas commensurate with the facts of reality are true. Resolving the contradiction means finding out which of the contradictory claims is false.

In the video below, Sabine Hossenfelder debunks some theoretical ideas such as string theory and multiverses, but then she endorses the Big Bang theory and black holes, which are equally untenable ideas! This illustrates a very common way that disinformation spreads — intentionally or not. One false idea is debunked, but at the same time a bigger one is reinforced.

When you fully begin to grasp that the fundamental philosophical ideas that have been driving western culture for more than 200 years are anti-reality and therefore anti-science, anti-knowledge, anti-rational; then you can begin to grasp the extent to which modern science is bankrupt. All recent advances in technology are in fact refinements and improvements of existing technologies. Fundamental new discoveries have ceased. The philosophical guidance by the intellectuals of the past 200 years have achieved their inevitable result. The thinking of men has been destroyed from the base. We are watching the slow motion road crash of a civilisation that is now out of touch with reality to a dangerous degree. Dangerous for human freedom, peace and prosperity.

In this video, Ep155 of “Living outside the Matrix” The logical fallacy behind the belief in the big bang is explained. It must be noted that most of the false beliefs in modern pseudoscience originate from logical fallacies in thinking. In other words, thinking errors, or errors of logic in our thinking result in people buying into all manner of nonsense.

Remember that things are what they are, A is A. The law of identity , the law of non-contradiction, and the law of causality are your best friends when discerning truth. Much of modern theoretical physics is simply nonsense. Its a real shame that it takes Flat Earthers to point this out, and in doing so discredit the observation in the eyes of those who recognise that the flat Earthers are flat wrong.

What do you think?